Author: Bakhramova, Mokhinur

Annotation: E-ARB systems around the world recognize that the decision cannot be objected to the competence of the decision. If the E-ARB decision is objectionable to the competence, it is considered invalid and its authority is reduced. The authority of the E-AR board issued by the Arbitral Court does not have the absolute authority, but the opposite authority has relative authority for its parties. Both sides may refuse the decision, or apply to another arbitral tribunal, just as they have a preliminary agreement on the arbitral tribunal. However, the demand for ratification of the UAE CPC is excluding foreign decisions and continues to require ratification of the UAE courts. A foreign arbitration decision must be submitted to the local court and approve it, which can revise the essence of the decision. Using their thoughts, the New York Convention has nothing to do not affect electronic decisions, as it corresponds to the process of final, compulsory and the specified procedure as an indicator of the final.

Keywords: E-ARB, UAE, Civil Procedure Law of UAE (CPC), UNCITRAL Model law, UAE courts, English Arbitration Law, Arab Convention on Commercial Arbitration, Final Executive Resolution, Dispute Resolution, DIFC, DIAC.

Pages in journal: 101 - 108